Today, Golders Green has again been shaken by serious violence. Two Jewish men, one in his 70s and one in his 30s, were stabbed in what police are treating as a terrorist incident. This was not an isolated disturbance and it was not random street disorder. It was a targeted act of violence that has caused fear far beyond the immediate scene and sent another shock through a community already carrying the weight of recent hostility.
I am appalled and sickened by this development. After many years of community activism, inter-faith dialogue, counter extremism and public protection work, I know how dangerous it is when violent hatred begins to settle into the everyday life of a neighbourhood. I also know that when attacks like this are met with vague statements and hollow political language, communities hear the gap between words and reality. Too often, leaders reach for formulaic condemnations that sound neat, balanced and detached, while people on the ground are left to absorb the trauma, fear and message of intimidation. That is not good enough now and it has not been good enough for some time.
What happened today must be named plainly because the facts matter. They demand seriousness, honesty and moral clarity. This cannot be softened into generic language about tensions, challenges or community concerns. It was an act of violence against Jewish victims in a place where the Jewish community should be able to live, move, worship and work in safety, without fear of being hunted, targeted or terrorised on British streets.
This attack does not sit in a vacuum. Only weeks ago, Hatzola ambulances were set alight in Golders Green. That attack should not be treated as a separate footnote with no connection to the present moment. It should be recognised as part of a deeply troubling pattern of escalating hostility. When visibly Jewish services are attacked, when Jewish residents are targeted and when each new incident is absorbed into the news cycle without a deeper reckoning, the danger grows. Violence tests the boundaries of what a society will tolerate. If those boundaries are not enforced clearly, others notice.
We cannot allow international conflicts to be imported onto British streets. That rule must be simple, firm and non-negotiable. People may hold strong views about events overseas. They may protest, organise, speak, disagree and campaign within the law. But no conflict abroad gives anyone permission to target communities here. No cause, however strongly felt, justifies bringing intimidation, revenge or ideological violence into local neighbourhoods. British streets are not an extension of anyone else’s battlefield. The moment we allow that line to blur, we undermine public safety, democratic order and the fragile trust that community cohesion depends on.
That is why the language used in response matters so much. If public figures rely on carefully managed, politically tidy statements that avoid moral clarity, they fail the people who most need protection. Communities do not need empty wording that gestures at concern while avoiding the hard truth. They also do not need politicians using divisive phrases such as acts of dominance, draining the swamp or a nation within a nation, because language like that does not calm tensions. It sharpens them. Leaders should say clearly that antisemitic violence is unacceptable, terrorism on our streets is unacceptable and the importation of overseas conflict into local community life is unacceptable. Anything less sounds performative. Anything less leaves room for further escalation.
We live side by side. We work together. We learn together. A threat to one community is a threat to all communities. Antisemitism has no place here. Anti-Muslim hatred and discrimination in all its forms has no place here. Bigotry of any kind has no place here. Community cohesion is not passive optimism and it is not branding language. It is active, disciplined work. It requires honesty, courage and consistency. It requires us to defend each other before hatred becomes normalised. If we fail to do that, we create precisely the conditions in which extremists and agitators thrive.
Community cohesion has been at the core of the work I have done for many years. It runs through education, interfaith dialogue, faith literacy and honest engagement with difficult issues before they are allowed to deepen into fear, alienation and harm. This work is not theoretical. It is rooted in the reality that misunderstanding can be exploited, grievance can be manipulated and communities can be driven apart when there is too little confidence, too little knowledge and too little willingness to challenge prejudice early. The task is to build resilience before further damage takes hold.
That is why education, safeguarding and prevention must be treated seriously. We need schools, colleges, organisations and community leaders who can manage difficult conversations responsibly, understand how radicalisation takes place, challenge misinformation and create environments where respect is stronger than fear. We need a public culture in which difficult truths can be spoken clearly, without euphemism and without political cowardice. Dialogue matters, but only when it is grounded in honesty. Cohesion matters, but only when it includes a firm refusal to tolerate hatred dressed up as political passion.
For schools, colleges, organisations and local leaders, this moment should prompt more than reflection. It should prompt action rooted in seriousness and responsibility. Safeguarding practice, Equality, Diversity and Inclusion work and faith literacy all matter because they help people understand how division takes root and how it can be interrupted before it hardens into violence. These are not administrative exercises for a filing cabinet. They are part of how we protect people, preserve trust and hold the line against extremist narratives in a tense and volatile climate.
There is also a wider civic responsibility. Communities must not look away. They must not excuse what should never be excused. They must not retreat into silence for fear of appearing impolite or politically inconvenient. Support those who have been targeted. Report hate crime. Stand in visible solidarity with neighbours under threat. Make it unmistakably clear that terrorism, antisemitism, anti-Muslim hatred, discrimination in all its forms and hate-fuelled violence will find no shelter here. That is how decent communities respond when tested. That is how the social fabric is defended.
Serious harm is rarely sudden in the way people imagine. It builds through tolerated hostility, rationalised hatred, evasive leadership and repeated failures to draw clear moral lines. Today’s knife attack in Golders Green must be understood in that context. It is not enough to be shocked. It is not enough to be angry. We must be honest about what happens when warning signs are minimised and when communities are left feeling exposed.
We are one community. We must protect each other. We must respect each other. We must stand together. We must be active allies. No more hate. No more terror on our streets. No more division. But cohesion, resilience and unity.